Science ↔ Guidelines [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2011-06-07 01:25 (5127 d 19:54 ago) – Posting: # 7080
Views: 10,110

My Capt’n!

❝ Of course it is extremely informative what this document tell us:

...Common sense and a clear focus on the needs of the regulatory authority assessor are the best guides...


Ha! You dropped the start of the sentence: »It should be emphasised that no guideline can cover all eventualities, and common sense …«

❝ It is crystal clear, isn't it? When they speak of needs, I am pretty sure they mean something with coffee.


Don’t forget the whipped sweet cream on top.

❝ Or perhaps a forced parametric analysis when residuals are not normal. Or something like that.


Why not? To quote yourself:

Garbage in, garbage out.
It’s very very simple.


❝ Don't we all wish we could coerce or unduly influence?


Well; I’m neither the investigator nor member of the trial staff – if you mean §4.8.3. :pirate:

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,674 registered users;
49 visitors (0 registered, 49 guests [including 17 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:19 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature
more difficult to explain than
simple, statistically probable things.    Richard Dawkins

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5