Science ↔ Guidelines [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2011-06-07 00:35 (5128 d 04:08 ago) – Posting: # 7079
Views: 10,053

Dear Helmut,

I am rather confused now.

❝ I agree with Hermann’s statement about guidelines quite a while ago. :ok: I support keeping (t)his order:

  1. Science (+ a drip of common sense)
  2. Guidelines

"common sense" ?
It isn't defined in any EU guideline or any eudralex document. I don't know how to validate it if anyone can propose a way of measuring it. Of course it is extremely informative what this document tell us:
...Common sense and a clear focus on the needs of the regulatory authority assessor are the best guides...
It is crystal clear, isn't it? When they speak of needs, I am pretty sure they mean something with coffee. Or perhaps a forced parametric analysis when residuals are not normal. Or something like that.

Don't we all wish we could coerce or unduly influence?


Best regards,
EM.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
39 visitors (0 registered, 39 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:44 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5