Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Results - comments [General Statistics]

posted by randombadger – UK, 2011-05-03 18:53 (5533 d 19:14 ago) – Posting: # 6986
Views: 13,427

Dear d_labes,

Thank you for your feedback.

Here are the fit statistics for the 2 models:

Model 1

-2 Res Log Likelihood        24.0

AIC (smaller is better)      30.0

AICC (smaller is better)     30.5

BIC (smaller is better)      33.0

Model 2

-2 Res Log Likelihood        22.0

AIC (smaller is better)      32.0

AICC (smaller is better)     33.3

BIC (smaller is better)      37.0

Interestingly, the 1st model is a better fit.

RB

Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete anything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post! [Helmut]

Complete thread:

Replicate Designs & IntraSubj CV randombadger 2011-04-28 13:02 [General Statistics]
- Replicate Designs & IntraSubj CV Helmut 2011-04-28 15:00
  - Replicate Designs & IntraSubj CV randombadger 2011-04-28 15:25
    - Replicate Designs & IntraSubj CV Helmut 2011-04-28 17:09
    - Inter-subject dance with the wolves d_labes 2011-04-29 11:33
      - How many subjects? jdetlor 2011-05-02 18:21
        
        G matrix d_labes 2011-05-03 08:26
        
        G matrix ElMaestro 2011-05-03 09:15
        
        G matrix d_labes 2011-05-03 09:51
        
        Results randombadger 2011-05-03 12:03
        
        Results - comments d_labes 2011-05-03 14:32
        
        Results - commentsrandombadger 2011-05-03 16:53
        
        Lost cents d_labes 2011-05-04 08:07
        
        G matrix ElMaestro 2011-05-03 14:16
        
        G matrix jdetlor 2011-05-03 19:37

Results - comments [General Sta­tis­tics]

Complete thread:

Results - comments [General Statistics]