Replicate Designs & IntraSubj CV [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2011-04-28 17:00 (5543 d 02:28 ago) – Posting: # 6965
Views: 13,965

Dear randombadger!

❝ I have a 3 period, 2 treatment XO design and would like to calculate the intra-subject CV for the two treatments.


Can you be a little be more specific? In some designs it’s possible to calculate CVs for both treatments, and in others not. FDA’s model for the commonly used partial replicate [TRR|RTR|RRT] is overspecified – you may get a number for CVWT, but only with a SAS-warning and being nonsense (since T is not replicated). Examples of 3-period replicate designs allowing estimation of both CVs are [TRT|RTR] or [TRT|RTR|TRR|RTT]. So which design do you have?

❝ According to FDA guidance, […]



Almost. You should use ddfm=satterth (Satterthwaite’s degrees of freedom) – not ddfm=kr (Kenward-Rogers); though I guess there shouldn’t be too much of a difference in results.

❝ however I see my colleagues are using the following: […]



Can you ask them for a reference for their code?

❝ My colleagues also included a carryover in the model but I believe the washout periods are long enough hence not required.


Carryover should go the statistical waste-bin. Stephen Senn devoted (almost) an entire book to this topic.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,656 posts in 4,994 threads, 1,570 registered users;
314 visitors (0 registered, 314 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:28 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Try to learn something about everything
and everything about something.    Thomas Henry Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5