Q&A published 14 March 2011 [BE/BA News]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2011-03-16 14:44 (4389 d 11:02 ago) – Posting: # 6762
Views: 32,634

Dear all,

the clarification is part of the recent version of the “Questions & Answers: Positions on specific questions addressed to the Pharmacokinetics Working Party” EMA/618604/2000 Rev. 3, dated 26 January 2011, published 14 March 2011.
The interesting part is Section 11. Clarification on the recommended statistical method for the analysis of a bioequivalence study (pages 21–32).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,548 posts in 4,723 threads, 1,606 registered users;
17 visitors (0 registered, 17 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:46 CET (Europe/Vienna)

You can’t really say “similar” if it’s the same again you want.
“Similar” means something different.    Anthony Burgess

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5