Q&A published 14 March 2011 [BE/BA News]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2011-03-16 14:44 (4389 d 11:02 ago) – Posting: # 6762
Views: 32,634

Dear all,

the clarification is part of the recent version of the “Questions & Answers: Positions on specific questions addressed to the Pharmacokinetics Working Party” EMA/618604/2000 Rev. 3, dated 26 January 2011, published 14 March 2011.
The interesting part is Section 11. Clarification on the recommended statistical method for the analysis of a bioequivalence study (pages 21–32).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,548 posts in 4,723 threads, 1,606 registered users;
17 visitors (0 registered, 17 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:46 CET (Europe/Vienna)

You can’t really say “similar” if it’s the same again you want.
“Similar” means something different.    Anthony Burgess

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz