scABE and missings [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2011-01-21 17:19 (5224 d 13:23 ago) – Posting: # 6478
Views: 30,459

Hi ElMaestro

❝ Correction: Sorry, I meant something else than I initially wrote. It is missing values that is the concern issue because of the difference between a normal linear model and the reml approach by a mixed model.


Good question! Next question please :-D.

To be honest: Don't know exactly. In the Progesterone guidance it is written "... Further assume that there are no missing observations ...". But only under the Heading "Example SAS Codes: fully replicated 4-way design".

My observation is that this guidance is in some instances rather vague or gives no sufficient explanation why what is done that way. Just to name "the unknown x = estimate2 - stderr2" or "use GLM for partial replicate and MIXED for full replicate".

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,670 registered users;
168 visitors (0 registered, 168 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:43 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If you shut your door to all errors
truth will be shut out.    Rabindranath Tagore

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5