slowly going off-topic [Software]
❝ The rationale is not scientific, it's just paranoia. The fear is that the lab could be tempted to repeat the assay if bioequivalence is not demonstrated, particularly for Cmax, to try and get "better" results. No reason to do such a thing in BA trials when developing a new drug.
Well paranoia is a reason you can’t deal with easily. Psychotherapy is not very effective treating ICD-10 F20.0, F22.0, F22.8; I’ve heard some drugs might help?
❝ There is a lot of regulatory paranoia regarding BE trials, but one has to admit that this paranoia is fed by inspection results. Remember the results of French inspections which were presented at the EGA meeting some years ago (2007 I think):
Sure; Lisbon! I’m recycling one of the slides in my lectures (remember: the nice one with the hand-drawn baseline of a low QC sample in order to ‘make’ a batch valid). I’m using the heading “Don’t try to fool inspectors!”
❝ basically, critical observations in half of the dossiers inspected, including fraud or some level of data manipulation in one quarter of the dossiers inspected.
![[image]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a1/Foucault_pendulum_animated.gif)
To quote Dirk Barends: In BE we forget the only important person, the patient!
He/she is a living person, not just α=0.05… To the right is Foucault’s pendulum. We started seeing ‘essential similarity’ from a clinical perspective (leader of the pack: Germany) and ended up with an in vivo dissolution test (measure of pharmaceutical quality: The Netherlands). Hopefully the pendulum will continue swinging.
BTW, Cmax is such a lousy PK metric that IMHO, it should be dropped from BE assessments at all – except for drugs/formulations where there are safety/efficacy issues (I want my headache to go away – now!).
It’s time to have another beer together – maybe at one of our Captain’s preferred harbor taverns.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- BLQ values in Winnonlin Dr. Harish L. Rao 2009-09-10 07:53 [Software]
- BLQ values in Winnonlin Ohlbe 2009-09-11 00:18
- BLQ values in Winnonlin > Status codes tool SDavis 2009-09-11 08:13
- BLQ values in Winnonlin > Status codes tool Ohlbe 2009-09-11 22:19
- Irregular profiles Helmut 2009-09-14 17:11
- About "PK repeats" Ohlbe 2009-09-14 22:01
- About "PK repeats" Helmut 2010-10-21 15:51
- About "PK repeats" Ohlbe 2010-10-21 16:38
- About "PK repeats" Helmut 2010-10-21 17:01
- About "PK repeats" Ohlbe 2010-10-21 17:32
- slowly going off-topicHelmut 2010-10-21 18:47
- About "PK repeats" Ohlbe 2010-10-21 17:32
- About "PK repeats" Helmut 2010-10-21 17:01
- About "PK repeats" ElMaestro 2010-10-21 16:56
- About "PK repeats" Helmut 2010-10-21 18:02
- About "PK repeats" Ohlbe 2010-10-21 16:38
- About "PK repeats" Helmut 2010-10-21 15:51
- BLQ Values in Winnonlin Dr. Harish L. Rao 2009-09-15 05:45
- About "PK repeats" Ohlbe 2009-09-14 22:01
- Irregular profiles Helmut 2009-09-14 17:11
- BLQ values in Winnonlin > Status codes tool Ohlbe 2009-09-11 22:19
- BLQ values in Winnonlin > Status codes tool SDavis 2009-09-11 08:13
- BLQ values in Winnonlin Ohlbe 2009-09-11 00:18