partial and fully replicated design [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by balakotu – India, 2010-10-12 15:57 (5737 d 06:08 ago) – Posting: # 6038
Views: 2,436

Dear All,

What are the advantages of Proc Mixed over Proc GLM procedures?

Why we don't accept in completers (who were absent in any of 4 periods) in a fully replicated study design?

As per recent guidance (Progesterone) we can't use a subject data who was absent for any of 4 periods in a fully replicated design study and the same guidelines states that for such a study we have to use Proc Mixed procedure only not for Proc Glm procedure. Here my question is even though we are using balance data why don't we use Proc Glm Procedure?

Regards
Waiting for the reply.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
269 visitors (0 registered, 269 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:05 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Don’t compromise yourself.
You are all you’ve got.    Janis Joplin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5