Not positive about that [Nonparametrics]

posted by martin  – Austria, 2010-09-16 23:00 (5261 d 05:24 ago) – Posting: # 5922
Views: 21,421

Dear HS!

thank you for your point of view, I just have a minor comment regarding the interpretation of relative effects. It's a probability that a randomly selected subject with R has a larger tmax value than a randomly selected subject with T (no effect would be indicated by a relative effect of 0.5).

for the given dataset, the probability of a randomly selected subject with R having a larger tmax value than a randomly selected subject with T is 63.3% (90% CI: 35.4% to 84.4%).

the other way round, the probability of a randomly selected subject with T having a smaller tmax value than a randomly selected subject with R is 63.3% (90% CI: 35.4% to 84.4%).

best regards

martin

PS.: this is a naive application to the dataset - some adjustments may necessary to account for the cross over design

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,379 posts in 4,913 threads, 1,661 registered users;
296 visitors (0 registered, 296 guests [including 18 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:24 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Statistics is the art of never having to say you’re wrong.
Variance is what any two statisticians are at.    C.J. Bradfield

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5