Not positive about that [Nonparametrics]

posted by martin  – Austria, 2010-09-16 23:00 (4967 d 17:59 ago) – Posting: # 5922
Views: 19,914

Dear HS!

thank you for your point of view, I just have a minor comment regarding the interpretation of relative effects. It's a probability that a randomly selected subject with R has a larger tmax value than a randomly selected subject with T (no effect would be indicated by a relative effect of 0.5).

for the given dataset, the probability of a randomly selected subject with R having a larger tmax value than a randomly selected subject with T is 63.3% (90% CI: 35.4% to 84.4%).

the other way round, the probability of a randomly selected subject with T having a smaller tmax value than a randomly selected subject with R is 63.3% (90% CI: 35.4% to 84.4%).

best regards

martin

PS.: this is a naive application to the dataset - some adjustments may necessary to account for the cross over design

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,991 posts in 4,827 threads, 1,647 registered users;
64 visitors (1 registered, 63 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:00 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If you don’t like something change it;
if you can’t change it, change the way you think about it.    Mary Engelbreit

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5