Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • simulants of the world unite

simulants of the world unite [Nonparametrics]

posted by Helmut – Vienna, Austria, 2010-09-15 18:17 (5349 d 13:22 ago) – Posting: # 5916
Views: 22,126

Dear Martin!

❝ here is a little bit faster version of the simulation code (ca. 30 min on my CPU)

Faster machine than mine (double Xeon 2.8GHz, 4GB RAM, 32bit XP Pro, hyperthreading on)...

I would use conf.level=0.90. At the start of the code
ptm <- proc.time()
and after the output


runtime <- proc.time() - ptm

cat("Runtime",runtime[1]/60,"minutes\n")

I got

print(cover1/nsim)

[1] 0.9288

print(cover2/nsim)

[1] 0.9359

Runtime 32.90417 minutes

❝ and here I am, for all my lore, the wretched fool I was before (Goethe)

Yep. For n₁=n₂=10 I would expect 0.9108...

—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

tmax in case of ties: R vs. R vs. SAS d_labes 2010-09-10 12:05 [Nonparametrics]
- tmax in case of ties: StatXact, Phoenix, and... Helmut 2010-09-10 18:28
  - Ties, no ties, ties, no ties ... d_labes 2010-09-13 13:21
    - simulation martin 2010-09-14 08:33
      - simulants of the world unite d_labes 2010-09-15 10:14
        
        simulants of the world unite martin 2010-09-15 14:53
        
        simulants of the world uniteHelmut 2010-09-15 16:17
        
        simul ants with no ties d_labes 2010-09-16 11:19
        
        simul ants with no ties Helmut 2010-09-16 14:01
        
        two different approaches martin 2010-09-16 15:35
- evaluation of tmax: use of relative effects? martin 2010-09-16 18:04
  - Not positive about that Helmut 2010-09-16 19:52
    - Not positive about that martin 2010-09-16 21:00
      - Stupidity Helmut 2010-09-17 13:10
- tmax in case of ties: R vs. R vs. SAS Jack 2010-09-20 14:03
  - R packages Helmut 2010-09-20 14:20
    - R packages code d_labes 2010-09-27 11:27
    - R packages Jack 2010-09-27 16:14
  - Is Exact exact? d_labes 2010-09-27 09:53