NTIDs [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Dr Andrew Leary – Ireland, 2010-08-29 11:15 (5362 d 23:57 ago) – Posting: # 5864
Views: 5,573

Hello Helmut

❝ Levothyroxine is not considered an NTID in Canada. No product specific GL in the US, but Liothyronine is also not considered an NTID.


In fact, there is a US guideline (Levothyroxine), but it is very controversial, with a number of critical papers written about same in the last 10 years.

❝ In Europe NTIDs are assessed on a case-by-case basis. Little is published yet (tacrolimus: AUC 90%-111%, Cmax 80%-125%; ciclosporine: AUC and Cmax 90%-111%).

❝ Would be interesting to know how Denmark will defend their requirements (updated on 8 Feb 2010) in the light of European harmonization (all immunosuppressives AUC and Cmax 90%-111% vs. EMA-Q&A tacrolimus AUC 90%-111%, Cmax 80%-125%).


Fair comment. I'll tell my client to seek regulatory advice before proceeding.

Kind regards

Andrew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,670 registered users;
58 visitors (0 registered, 58 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:13 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

My doctor gave me six months to live,
but when I couldn’t pay the bill
he gave me six months more.    Walter Matthau

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5