NTIDs [Regulatives / Guidelines]
Hello Helmut
In fact, there is a US guideline (Levothyroxine), but it is very controversial, with a number of critical papers written about same in the last 10 years.
Fair comment. I'll tell my client to seek regulatory advice before proceeding.
Kind regards
Andrew
❝ Levothyroxine is not considered an NTID in Canada. No product specific GL in the US, but Liothyronine is also not considered an NTID.
In fact, there is a US guideline (Levothyroxine), but it is very controversial, with a number of critical papers written about same in the last 10 years.
❝ In Europe NTIDs are assessed on a case-by-case basis. Little is published yet (tacrolimus: AUC 90%-111%, Cmax 80%-125%; ciclosporine: AUC and Cmax 90%-111%).
❝ Would be interesting to know how Denmark will defend their requirements (updated on 8 Feb 2010) in the light of European harmonization (all immunosuppressives AUC and Cmax 90%-111% vs. EMA-Q&A tacrolimus AUC 90%-111%, Cmax 80%-125%).
Fair comment. I'll tell my client to seek regulatory advice before proceeding.
Kind regards
Andrew
Complete thread:
- Denmark: 100% included in Confidence Interval Helmut 2006-05-26 14:46 [Regulatives / Guidelines]
- Denmark: 100% included in Confidence Interval Dr Andrew Leary 2010-08-26 16:56
- NTIDs Helmut 2010-08-26 17:48
- NTIDsDr Andrew Leary 2010-08-29 09:15
- NTIDs Helmut 2010-08-26 17:48
- Denmark: 100% included in Confidence Interval Dr Andrew Leary 2010-08-26 16:56