No chance against RMS? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2010-08-10 18:26 (4998 d 10:44 ago) – Posting: # 5765
Views: 15,106

Dear Dan,

Under the first point I think I would add that you have not (have you?) received questions for module 3 and specifications; thus, the potential variability from the studies reflects -at least in part- the natural variation within the specifications that the M3 assessor has accepted.

You are right, a referral will not be triggered if the RMS disagrees. This is a new thing and there is very little you can do. If the RMS enforces a principle that has never been defined in a guideline document and which is not in line with contemporary equivalence thinking then honestly I think this would be a case for the European Generics Association. This is a slow process and not one that can be expected to work here and now.
Having said that, I am pretty sure regulators from BfArM are seeing this thread and giving it some consideration. That would potentially be in your favour.

I actually still believe your product is alive.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,984 posts in 4,822 threads, 1,655 registered users;
45 visitors (0 registered, 45 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:10 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature
more difficult to explain than
simple, statistically probable things.    Richard Dawkins

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5