meta analysis? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2010-08-06 20:31 (5005 d 00:45 ago) – Posting: # 5735
Views: 15,657

Dear ElMaestro!

❝ I am afraid I do not have a qualified opinion.


Me not either, but I’m a little bit concerned about the (lacking) α-spending in meta analysis.

❝ Do you have a good idea about m.a.? I'd be happy to hear.


See Chapter 16 in Chow & Liu (3rd ed. 2009). They refer to two models (based on 2×2 cross-over studies only), where the first one is rather restrictive – assuming equal CVintra and CVinter across studies. Personal experience: nil.


  1. Chow S-C, Liu J-p. Meta-analysis for bioequivalence review.
    J Biopharm Stat. 1997:7(1):97–111. doi:10.1080/10543409708835172
  2. Chow S-C, J Shao J. Bioequivalence review for drug interchangeability.
    J Biopharm Stat. 1999;9(3):485–97. doi:10.1081/BIP-100101189

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,988 posts in 4,825 threads, 1,661 registered users;
101 visitors (0 registered, 101 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:17 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The only way to comprehend what mathematicians mean by Infinity
is to contemplate the extent of human stupidity.    Voltaire

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5