Representative batches? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2010-08-05 14:45 (5011 d 01:12 ago) – Posting: # 5726
Views: 15,510

Dear Dan!

❝ But can you argue with the assessor without statistics?


Statistics – A subject which most statisticians find difficult
but in which nearly all physicians are expert.
Stephen Senn

EMEA. The European Medicines Evaluation Agency.
The drug regulatory agency of the European Union.
A statistician-free zone.
Stephen Senn; Statistical Issues in Drug Development. Wiley, p386, 2004


❝ As other sponsors we selected T & R batches which matched closely. Comparative dissolution profiles showed similarity and the assay content differed less than 5%.

❝ From the quality point of view we see no difference between the batches.


Yes, everybody did/does it that way (see also the last paragraph in ElMaestro’s post). Of course that's not representative, but 'best'.

❝ The logic consequence would be that for the release of any batch you produce for the market you have to perform a BE study as quality control.


Yes, but would be applicable to the innovator as well. I would remind the assessor that this idea was already abandoned 15+ years ago and on the consequences.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,993 posts in 4,828 threads, 1,658 registered users;
55 visitors (0 registered, 55 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:58 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

So far as I can remember,
there is not one word in the Gospels
in praise of intelligence.    Bertrand Russell

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5