AIC, BIC and that all ... [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2010-07-15 14:01 (5815 d 13:06 ago) – Posting: # 5635
Views: 16,922

Dear Helmut,

❝ let's continue!


           -2 REML log(LikH)   AIC       BIC
SAS (FDA)      272.910       282.9     291.8
PHX/WNL        251.724       273.724   304.923
lme()          271.654       291.654   320.096


❝ ❝ Seems WNL computes different.


Seems SAS computes different.
According to the SAS help on Proc MIXED:

AIC = -2*LL + 2*d
BIC = -2*LL + d*log(n)

Here LL denotes the maximum value of the (possibly restricted) log likelihood, d the dimension of the model, and n the number of observations. In SAS 6 of SAS/STAT software, n equals the number of valid observations for maximum likelihood estimation and n-p for restricted maximum likelihood estimation, where p equals the rank of X. In later versions, n equals the number of effective subjects as displayed in the "Dimensions" table, unless this value equals 1, in which case n equals the number of levels of the first random effect you specify in a RANDOM statement. If the number of effective subjects equals 1 and you have no RANDOM statements, n then reverts to the SAS 6 values. For restricted likelihood estimation, d equals q, the effective number of estimated covariance parameters. In SAS 6, when a parameter estimate lies on a boundary constraint, then it is still included in the calculation of d, but in later versions it is not. The most common example of this behavior is when a variance component is estimated to equal zero. For maximum likelihood estimation, d equals q+p.

A very concise and clear description of the calculations in SAS 9.2 :confused:. That recognize who will or can.

Of course the R's lme() values are different from SAS's. The R folks undertake each effort to do things not the <$ineffable$> way :-D.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,654 posts in 4,992 threads, 1,571 registered users;
143 visitors (0 registered, 143 guests [including 32 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:08 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists often have a naïve faith that
if only they could discover enough facts about a problem,
these facts would somehow arrange themselves
in a compelling and true solution.    Theodosius Dobzhansky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5