SAS and/or Phoenix/WinNonlin-experts around? [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2010-07-13 04:29 (5421 d 22:43 ago) – Posting: # 5613
Views: 14,511

Dear Paolo!

Had a quick look in Phoenix6.1 (average BE, too late to get FDA's model running).
Fixed: SEQUENCE+TREATMEN+PERIOD
Repeated Specification:
PERIOD
Variance Blocking Variables (Subject): SUBJECT
Group: TREATMEN
Type: Variance Components
Random Effects: TREATMEN
Variance Blocking Variables (Subject): SUBJECT
Type: Banded No-Diagonal Factor Analytic (f)
Number of factors (f): 2

I got:
Warning 11091: Newton's algorithm converged with modified Hessian. Output is suspect.
Model may be over-specified. A simpler model could be tried.

and sigma²WR 0.1861995 (CVWR 0.452397)

If I try IBE/PBE I got:
*** WARNING 11121: Subject X had incomplete design and was discarded.
*** WARNING 11122: Sequence RTR had less than two complete subjects and was discarded.
*** WARNING 11122: Sequence TRR had less than two complete subjects and was discarded.
*** ERROR 11107: Fewer than two sequences had complete design. Program termininating.

X in the warning above is the ID of all subjects except ones in sequence RRT. That was it. :confused:


P.S.: Please delete anything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post!

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,669 registered users;
158 visitors (0 registered, 158 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:13 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

By all means let’s be open-minded, but not so open-minded
that our brains drop out.    Richard Dawkins

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5