Outlier tests (EMA) [Outliers]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2010-06-08 17:15 (5509 d 01:08 ago) – Posting: # 5474
Views: 20,161

Dear KR and all,

at last week’s EGA workshop one of the issues was following statement (Section 4.1.10) of the BE-GL

For the acceptance interval to be widened the bioequivalence study must be of a replicate design where it has been demonstrated that the within-subject variability for Cmax of the reference compound in the study is >30%. The applicant should justify that the calculated intra-subject variability is a reliable estimate and that it is not the result of outliers.


No clarification is given in the presentations, but EMA’s panellists agreed thatWell, box plots are a wide field (:vomit: nonparametric by nature!). Keywords: lower/upper adjacent values, inner and outer fence,… Most people would treat values outside the lower/upper quartile ±3× the interquartile range (IQR) as severe outliers (and ±1.5× IQR as mild outliers), but even the method of calculating the quartiles and IQR is not unambigous. ;-)

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,428 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,697 registered users;
66 visitors (0 registered, 66 guests [including 24 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:24 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority
is not using his intelligence;
he is just using his memory.    Leonardo da Vinci

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5