NTIDs # HVDs (or not?) [Design Issues]

posted by ioanam – Romania, 2010-06-07 20:17 (5015 d 04:32 ago) – Posting: # 5458
Views: 8,061

Dear Helmut
Thank you for your response.

I am talking about sirolimus. This agent have a high intra-subject CV%, but is also subject for TDM.

"The therapeutic window of sirolimus may be relatively narrow. Therefore, optimal use of sirolimus requires careful attention to maintenance of therapeutic levels". (National PBM Drug Monograph Sirolimus (Rapamune®)).
and
"As described for the solution, the intra- and inter-individual variability in trough levels is high (40-50%)" (see page 17 in the following link http://www.ema.europa.eu/humandocs/PDFs/EPAR/rapamune/420600en6.pdf).

The problem here is that the sponsor requested a bioequivalence study in healthy subjects.
I have seen before different studies performed with other immunosuppressives (cyclosporin) in healthy volunteers, but only 2-way crossover. Any increase number of periods will harm the safety profile. :-(

I don't know what to do now. Too many subjects to be enrolled.
Kindest regards, Jo


Edit: Document linked. [Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,916 posts in 4,807 threads, 1,646 registered users;
24 visitors (0 registered, 24 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:49 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Nothing shocks me. I’m a scientist.    Harrison Ford (as Indiana Jones)

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5