My lack of understanding [Regulatives / Guidelines]
Dear KR,
There's an old Chinese proverb that goes like this:
If in doubt about BE-statistics, ask d_labes.
As a pure amateur from the lowest rank of scum, here's what I imagine would be a possible approach:
Your starting point is a dataset consisting of n subjects. On each subject, you have 4 pharmacodynamic data points: Run-in, test, ref-lo, ref-hi. Then...
Best regards
EM.
❝ Would you please provide some more clarification/explaination to conduct the pharmacodynamic and statistical analysis considering the practical applicability in mind ?
There's an old Chinese proverb that goes like this:
If in doubt about BE-statistics, ask d_labes.
As a pure amateur from the lowest rank of scum, here's what I imagine would be a possible approach:
Your starting point is a dataset consisting of n subjects. On each subject, you have 4 pharmacodynamic data points: Run-in, test, ref-lo, ref-hi. Then...
- Put all numbers 1...n into a hat.
- Ask a NLYW to pull out one of these numbers n times. Everytime she pulls out a number she notes the sampled number down and puts the number back in the hat.
- Once she has done it you take the piece of paper she has written which contains n numbers of which some might be identical. With this piece of papers you construct your sample dataset as Run-in, test, ref-lo, and ref-hi for each subject number she pulled out of the hat (remember: one subject's data might occur more than once in the sampled dataset).
- On this sample dataset you fit your ref data to the model in the guideline.
- Knowing the nominal strength of the test, you can now calculate a relative potency from the sample. You write down that reltive potency.
- You give the NLYW a new and blank piece of paper, sharpen her pencil, and steps 2...5 are now repeated a lot of times. The more the better. I do not know the minimum, but I'd put the lower limit at 500 because FDA has used that limit in other bootstrap applications.
- You now have 500 (or whatever) recordings on relative potency. Now you go to the library and figure out the BCA from those 500 (or whatever) numbers.
- You submkit your data to the Organic Grocery Deals and await approval.
Best regards
EM.
—
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
Complete thread:
- Orlistat Bioequivalence KR 2010-04-23 06:14 [Regulatives / Guidelines]
- To Abreviate or not to Abreviate d_labes 2010-04-23 09:28
- What was really meant ElMaestro 2010-04-23 09:50
- OGD Guidance Helmut 2010-04-23 12:42
- To Abreviate or not to Abreviate KR 2010-04-23 15:01
- Calm and serene d_labes 2010-04-23 15:47
- To Abreviate or not to Abreviate ElMaestro 2010-04-24 08:16
- To Abreviate or not to Abreviate KR 2010-04-26 06:03
- To Abreviate or not to Abreviate GSTATS 2010-05-27 18:30
- My lack of understanding ElMaestro 2010-05-28 00:54
- My lack of understanding GSTATS 2010-05-28 17:03
- My lack of understanding ElMaestro 2010-05-29 03:32
- My lack of understanding GSTATS 2010-05-29 05:28
- My lack of understanding KR 2010-05-31 08:51
- My lack of understandingElMaestro 2010-06-01 16:13
- Calculation sangeeta 2011-11-29 17:58
- Calculation ElMaestro 2011-11-29 18:09
- Calculation sangeeta 2011-11-29 18:30
- Calculation ElMaestro 2011-11-30 11:35
- Calculation sangeeta 2011-11-29 18:30
- Calculation ElMaestro 2011-11-29 18:09
- Calculation sangeeta 2011-11-29 17:58
- My lack of understandingElMaestro 2010-06-01 16:13
- My lack of understanding KR 2010-05-31 08:51
- My lack of understanding GSTATS 2010-05-29 05:28
- My lack of understanding ElMaestro 2010-05-29 03:32
- My lack of understanding GSTATS 2010-05-28 17:03
- My lack of understanding ElMaestro 2010-05-28 00:54
- To Abreviate or not to Abreviate GSTATS 2010-05-27 18:30
- To Abreviate or not to Abreviate KR 2010-04-26 06:03
- What was really meant ElMaestro 2010-04-23 09:50
- To Abreviate or not to Abreviate d_labes 2010-04-23 09:28