Modelling Parallel bears [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2010-04-25 22:40 (5489 d 14:06 ago) – Posting: # 5215
Views: 58,364

(edited on 2010-04-25 23:42)

Hi Bears,

❝ When I revised bear today, I found that the following two models got the same results (...)


The results are similar for the fixed effect (here: formulation). The relationship between the lm's residual and the lme's variance components is described above.

Now, just to add a little confusion:
D_labes pointed out some confusion about the results from the lme, but in my opinion there is also funny stuff going on with the lm: Negative adjusted r squared. Another cosmic mindf#&@er from the realm of statistics. I love it.

Best regards
EM.

PS: Yes, I am aware of the definitions, e.g. Wikipedia.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
41 visitors (0 registered, 41 guests [including 1 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:47 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It’s always fun to have your models validated,
but is way more fun to have them trashed.
Finding out you are completely wrong
is a great part of science.    G. Randall Gladstone

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5