Youngster's solution [Software]
![[image]](img/uploaded/image9.jpg)
❝ From the same times (but a tick later) originates the TOPFIT solution, a program running under MS-DOS:
Oh, TopFit (like billards it required a combination of imagination, skill, patience, and devotion). I wouldn’t call it a dinosaur – at sweet seventeen has not reached adolescence yet.
- Heinzel G, Woloszczak R, Thomann P. TopFit Version 2.0: Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Data Analysis System for the PC. Stuttgart, Jena, New York: Gustav Fischer; 1993.
- Tanswell P, Koup J. TopFit: a PC-based pharmacokinetic / pharmacodynamic data analysis program. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1993;31(10):514–20.

❝ 1. Calculate regression line of the terminal part of excretion
❝
rates to obtain lambdaZ (like Far side solution)
❝ 2. calculate excretion rate at tlast from that regression line
❝ 3. Ae(inf) := Ae(tlast) + excretion_rate((tlast)/lambdaZ
Are you sure?
![[image]](img/uploaded/image41.png)
Step 1 gives lambdaZ 0.1545, t½ 4.49
Step 2 gives 69.50 (measured 62.40) * see my edit at the end
Step 3 gives 8642.7+69.5/0.1545=9092.68 but I can't find it in TopFit:
============================================================================
TopFit V 2.0 Page 2 of 3
*** NON-COMPARTMENTAL ANALYSIS ***
File : WNLURINE 9.04.2010 16:56
============================================================================
Formulation no 1
Type of formulation Absorption (Tablet)
Name of formulation WNL Urine.pwo
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** DOSING TABLE ***
No Time Dose Duration Entry
[hour][mg/individual] compartment
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 0.00000 10.00000 0.00000 0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Data set no 1
Sample matrix Urine
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
No Time Value R
[hour] [mg]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 0.00000 0.00000
2 2.00000 420.00000
3 4.00000 1377.00000
4 6.00000 4372.20000
5 10.00000 6198.00000
6 18.00000 8268.30000
7 24.00000 8642.70000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
No Time Excretion R
Rates
[hour] [mg/hour]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 1.00000 210.00000
2 3.00000 478.50000
3 5.00000 1497.60000
4 8.00000 456.45000 *
5 14.00000 258.78750 *
6 21.00000 62.40000 *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
* in column R marks values which are used for regression
============================================================================
TopFit V 2.0 Page 3 of 3
*** NON-COMPARTMENTAL ANALYSIS ***
File : WNLURINE 9.04.2010 16:56
============================================================================
No Time (Ui-U) R
[hour] [mg]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 0.00000 8642.70000
2 2.00000 8222.70000
3 4.00000 7265.70000
4 6.00000 4270.50000 *
5 10.00000 2444.70000 *
6 18.00000 374.40000 *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
* in column R marks values which are used for regression
*** MRT mean residence time (excretion) ***
Lambda t½ MRT
[1/hour] [hour] [hour]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
excretion rates 0.15445 4.48778 8.74997
Ui-U 0.20737 3.34248 8.77977
Ui extrapolated 0.14621 4.74068 8.74836
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total amount excreted [mg] 8925.8
There’s another fit – corresponding to the table above:
![[image]](img/uploaded/image42.png)
According to the documentation 2-58:
The amount excreted at tlast is assumed to be the Aeinf-value.
My emphasis. Nice assumption. Why try to extrapolate, if we already ‘know’ the value - because we have sampled until complete excretion). That's corresponding to Gabrielsson’s/Weiner’s ARE-method (Amount Remaining to be Recovered).From this fit we get lambdaZ 0.2074, t½ 3.34; now what?
Never try to ‘understand’ software you haven’t written yourself.
Edit:

—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- Pk parameter: Urine study (WinNonlin) AA 2010-04-07 07:01 [Software]
- Ae-inf based on rate Helmut 2010-04-07 18:26
- Ae-inf based on rate AA 2010-04-08 14:08
- Amount_ Recovered = Ae(0-t) Helmut 2010-04-08 14:27
- Already a PK-model? H_Rotter 2010-04-08 20:07
- Already a PK-model? Helmut 2010-04-08 20:47
- Dinosaurs solution. d_labes 2010-04-09 09:31
- Youngster's solutionHelmut 2010-04-09 17:25
- Some youngsters may be very old d_labes 2010-04-12 09:39
- Youngster's solutionHelmut 2010-04-09 17:25
- Dinosaurs solution. d_labes 2010-04-09 09:31
- Already a PK-model? Helmut 2010-04-08 20:47
- Ae-inf based on rate SDavis 2010-04-09 13:10
- Replicate design studies in Phoenix/WinNonlin Helmut 2010-04-09 17:47
- Ae-inf based on rate AA 2010-04-08 14:08
- Ae-inf based on rate Helmut 2010-04-07 18:26