Youngster's solution [Software]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2010-04-09 19:25 (5551 d 04:01 ago) – Posting: # 5067
Views: 19,674

[image]Dear D. Labes!

❝ From the same times (but a tick later) originates the TOPFIT solution, a program running under MS-DOS:


Oh, TopFit (like billards it required a combination of imagination, skill, patience, and devotion). I wouldn’t call it a dinosaur – at sweet seventeen has not reached adolescence yet.What I really liked, was the ingenious method of running any model without initial estimates – even the most ambitious user defined ones. At that time PCNONLIN drove my crazy because I couldn’t find suitable ones in many cases. When I switched to the first version of WinNonlin (mainly for the graphical capabilities) I still (mis)used TopFit to get initial estimates for tricky models. ;-)

❝ 1. Calculate regression line of the terminal part of excretion

  rates to obtain lambdaZ (like Far side solution)

❝ 2. calculate excretion rate at tlast from that regression line

❝ 3. Ae(inf) := Ae(tlast) + excretion_rate((tlast)/lambdaZ


Are you sure?

[image]
Step 1 gives lambdaZ 0.1545, t½ 4.49
Step 2 gives 69.50 (measured 62.40) * see my edit at the end
Step 3 gives 8642.7+69.5/0.1545=9092.68 but I can't find it in TopFit: ============================================================================
TopFit V 2.0                                                     Page 2 of 3
                     *** NON-COMPARTMENTAL ANALYSIS ***
File : WNLURINE                                              9.04.2010 16:56
============================================================================
Formulation no                                                             1
Type of formulation                                      Absorption (Tablet)
Name of formulation                                            WNL Urine.pwo
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                            *** DOSING TABLE ***
             No           Time           Dose       Duration          Entry
                        [hour][mg/individual]                   compartment
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              1        0.00000       10.00000        0.00000              0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Data set no                                                                1
Sample matrix                                                          Urine
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             No           Time          Value              R
                        [hour]           [mg] ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              1        0.00000        0.00000
              2        2.00000      420.00000
              3        4.00000     1377.00000
              4        6.00000     4372.20000
              5       10.00000     6198.00000
              6       18.00000     8268.30000
              7       24.00000     8642.70000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             No           Time      Excretion              R
                                        Rates
                        [hour]      [mg/hour]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              1        1.00000      210.00000
              2        3.00000      478.50000
              3        5.00000     1497.60000
              4        8.00000      456.45000              *
              5       14.00000      258.78750              *
              6       21.00000       62.40000              *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
* in column R marks values which are used for regression

============================================================================
TopFit V 2.0                                                     Page 3 of 3
                     *** NON-COMPARTMENTAL ANALYSIS ***
File : WNLURINE                                              9.04.2010 16:56
============================================================================
             No           Time         (Ui-U)              R
                        [hour]           [mg] ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              1        0.00000     8642.70000
              2        2.00000     8222.70000
              3        4.00000     7265.70000
              4        6.00000     4270.50000              *
              5       10.00000     2444.70000              *
              6       18.00000      374.40000              *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
* in column R marks values which are used for regression

                *** MRT mean residence time (excretion) ***
                        Lambda             t½            MRT
                      [1/hour]         [hour]         [hour] ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
excretion rates        0.15445        4.48778        8.74997
           Ui-U        0.20737        3.34248        8.77977
Ui extrapolated        0.14621        4.74068        8.74836
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total amount excreted                                   [mg]      8925.8


There’s another fit – corresponding to the table above:
[image]
According to the documentation 2-58:

The amount excreted at tlast is assumed to be the Aeinf-value.

My emphasis. Nice assumption. Why try to extrapolate, if we already ‘know’ the value - because we have sampled until complete excretion). That's corresponding to Gabriels­son’s/Weiner’s ARE-method (Amount Remaining to be Recovered).
From this fit we get lambdaZ 0.2074, t½ 3.34; now what?
Never try to ‘understand’ software you haven’t written yourself.


Edit: :PCchaos: Now I got it. tlast = 24 - not the last midpoint time (21). You stated this in your step 2 (Lesen bildet). Therefore the estimated last rate 43.27, 8642.7+43.27/0.1545=8925.82, matching TopFit.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,674 registered users;
39 visitors (0 registered, 39 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:26 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature
more difficult to explain than
simple, statistically probable things.    Richard Dawkins

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5