Evaluation of Reference variability [Design Issues]
Dear Marcel!
No problem - if you think we need some more forensics, go for exhumation!
No. Or to be more precise, nobody asked that question, but I would bet the answer would have been a straight "No!" as well.
I would say there are two reasons.
❝ My apologies for dragging this replicate skeleton out of the closet when it seemed like it was comfortably resting.
No problem - if you think we need some more forensics, go for exhumation!
❝ Was there any mention at this meeting as to whether the results of a replicate design study (finding of intra-subject variablility exceeding 30%) with a lower strength can be used to justify widen acceptance limits for a higher strength of the same drug to undergo a standard BE study?
No. Or to be more precise, nobody asked that question, but I would bet the answer would have been a straight "No!" as well.
❝ If this is not allowed, can someone explain why not?
I would say there are two reasons.
- The general reason, that no reference to previous studies is allowed when it comes to widening of the acceptance range. CVintra,ref >30% must be demonstrated within the submitted study.
- There is also a pharmacokinetic reason. Drugs with nonlinear PK may show different variability throughout the dose range. Think about e.g., saturation effects. Example: ASS -> salicylic acid.
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- Evaluation of Reference variability Nirali 2009-04-13 11:53 [Design Issues]
- Evaluation of Reference variability KR 2009-04-13 14:39
- Evaluation of Reference variability Ravi 2009-04-14 06:25
- Evaluation of Reference variability Nirali 2009-04-17 07:38
- Evaluation of Reference variability Ohlbe 2009-04-17 10:04
- Evaluation of Reference variability Helmut 2009-04-17 13:44
- Evaluation of Reference variability Nirali 2009-04-18 09:04
- Evaluation of Reference variability Helmut 2009-04-18 12:31
- Evaluation of Reference variability Nirali 2009-04-18 19:34
- Evaluation of Reference variability Helmut 2009-04-18 12:31
- Evaluation of Reference variability Marcel 2010-03-16 13:10
- Evaluation of Reference variabilityHelmut 2010-03-16 16:01
- Evaluation of Reference variability ElMaestro 2010-03-16 17:13
- Some desultory thoughts Helmut 2010-03-16 18:59
- Evaluation of Reference variability Marcel 2010-03-17 12:47
- Evaluation of Reference variability ElMaestro 2010-03-16 17:13
- Evaluation of Reference variabilityHelmut 2010-03-16 16:01
- Evaluation of Reference variability Nirali 2009-04-18 09:04
- Evaluation of Reference variability Nirali 2009-04-17 07:38