What if… [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Dr_Dan  – Germany, 2010-03-12 09:49 (5952 d 02:30 ago) – Posting: # 4900
Views: 15,910

Dear Helmut
You are a statistician, I am a project manager. The purpose of a bioequivalence study is not to describe the full pharmacokinetics (including food effect) of a drug entity but to detect differences between galenic formulations. Since it is acceptable to conduct either two separate two-way cross over-studies or a four-way cross-over study in cases where information is required in both the fed and fasted states I would always suggest to perform two separate two-way cross over-studies. I totally agree that from a scientific point of view the four-way cross-over study is much more interesting but from a practical (generic company's) point of view you should prefer the other option.
Kind regards
Dan

Kind regards and have a nice day
Dr_Dan

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,572 registered users;
342 visitors (0 registered, 342 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:19 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5