ANOVA only - no doubts [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2010-02-12 22:09 (5605 d 14:04 ago) – Posting: # 4757
Views: 23,822

Dear HS,

ANOVA only. Full stop.


This is becoming more and more mysterious. Anova and mixed effects modeling are not mutually exclusive, and it sounds to me like they have not realised the difference between a model and an anova.
They will sooner or later realise that if the guideline in its present form is to be followed there is no way to come up with correctly estimated intra-subject variabilities in a replicated study.
Furthermore, the entire section 4.1.10 has no relevance unless mixed modeling is used.

This is regrettable.
EM.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,675 registered users;
37 visitors (0 registered, 37 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:13 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Philosophy, like medicine, has plenty of drugs, few good remedies,
and hardly any specific cures.    Sebastien-Roch Nicolas de Chamfort

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5