Bias? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2010-02-05 17:00 (5612 d 18:01 ago) – Posting: # 4716
Views: 24,074

Dear HS,

❝ Next I tortured the software and set R1 or R2 to ‘Missing’ (ignoring the warning messages).

❝ Full 3-period model with missing values:


        PE      90% CI      CV%

T/R1 103.81  95.46  112.89  11.24% no period effect

T/R2  84.65  75.93   94.36  14.59%

T/R1 104.1   95.83  112.89  11.03% +P3 effect

T/R2  85.20  76.78   94.55  13.98%


Something is wrong here, or I am not getting it right. If all R1's are missing then an R1 effect cannot be estimated (for example, a column with all zero's in the model matrix for that effect, or, a beta vector shortened by one because that effect is left out). Are you sure you deleted all objects prior to re-running the analysis?

Since this goes off thread, I would be happy enough if this could be colported to its own thread.

EM.


Edit: See the follow-up thread. [Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,675 registered users;
34 visitors (0 registered, 34 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:01 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Philosophy, like medicine, has plenty of drugs, few good remedies,
and hardly any specific cures.    Sebastien-Roch Nicolas de Chamfort

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5