Bias? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2010-02-05 10:33 (5612 d 21:04 ago) – Posting: # 4713
Views: 24,354

Dear HS,

firefighters??

❝ So I fired up a little simulation.


I LUUUV simulations! In this case, though, I do not understand the details. Did you simulate one or many datasets?
Did you investigate the T/R as n approaches inf?

❝ As expected PEs are unbiased in either method. In the full (correct, as I would dare to call it) model there is a common CV. Like D Labes already suspected, CVs in the 'missing data model' and in the extracted tables are different.


(G)LM's discard 2x2x2 data when missing values are involved. Mixed models fit via REML that optise a likelihood given a model; that can readily be done regardless of a missing value here or there.

❝ The outcome in some cases is anticonservative. Regulators, do you read this?


Or: Companies, let the music play! But actually, when you say in some cases, can that be quantified, as in, how often versus how often not?

EM.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,675 registered users;
25 visitors (0 registered, 25 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:38 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Philosophy, like medicine, has plenty of drugs, few good remedies,
and hardly any specific cures.    Sebastien-Roch Nicolas de Chamfort

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5