Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • Final EMA oracle

Final EMA oracle [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro – Denmark, 2010-02-01 15:54 (5570 d 19:36 ago) – Posting: # 4682
Views: 24,225

Dear d_labes, dear HS,

it was only an attempt from my side to guess how regulators would think in relation to that sentence; it was not an attempt to justify the science behind it.

What makes me think like I do has to do with

Vocabulary. I think the sentence leaves little room for interpretation in its present form. The way that sentence is written I would definitely say that pruning a dataset (however bad science one may think it is) is compliant.
Regulatory checking of results. In several countries across Europe, I think assessor teams do not routinely involve statisticians and the capability of an assessor to check results will in such cases be limited to simpler data like those from 2-seq 2-per 2-trt studies. If the applicant can prune the data they become widely checkable.
Bear also in mind that the reason why only noncomportmental modeling is accepted has in large part to do with exactly the same.

Best regards
EM.

Complete thread:

EMA BE guideline - final version Ohlbe 2010-01-28 18:31 [Regulatives / Guidelines]
- Final version published Helmut 2010-01-29 14:29
  - Final version published ElMaestro 2010-01-29 17:02
    - Statistix Helmut 2010-01-29 17:30
      - Statistix ElMaestro 2010-01-29 18:11
    - Calories ;-) Helmut 2010-01-29 19:22
      - Calories ;-) ElMaestro 2010-01-29 20:43
        
        Calories ;-) Helmut 2010-01-29 21:08
      - Variable calories d_labes 2010-02-01 12:05
    - ANOVA only - no doubts Helmut 2010-02-10 23:41
      - ANOVA only - no doubts ElMaestro 2010-02-12 21:09
  - Final EMA oracle d_labes 2010-02-01 11:53
    - Final EMA oracle Helmut 2010-02-01 12:28
    - Final EMA oracle ElMaestro 2010-02-01 12:50
      - More then two EMA oracles d_labes 2010-02-01 13:30
        
        Less of an issue ElMaestro 2010-02-01 15:29
        
        Less or More of an issue d_labes 2010-02-01 16:53
        
        Less or More of an issue ElMaestro 2010-02-01 17:22
        
        Effective with 1 Aug 2010 Helmut 2010-02-02 00:55
        Bias? ElMaestro 2010-02-04 11:27
        
        Bias? Helmut 2010-02-05 02:03
        
        Bias? ElMaestro 2010-02-05 09:33
        
        Bias? Helmut 2010-02-05 10:21
        
        Bias? d_labes 2010-02-05 13:59
        Bias? ElMaestro 2010-02-05 16:00
        
        Bias? Helmut 2010-02-05 19:14
      - Final EMA oracle Helmut 2010-02-01 13:43
        
        Final EMA oracleElMaestro 2010-02-01 14:54
        
        Final EMA oracle d_labes 2010-02-01 15:20
        
        Teaching Helmut 2010-02-01 16:07
  - Cmin really gone? tmax reappeared? d_labes 2010-02-01 14:02
    - Cmin really gone. tmax reappeared - but how? Helmut 2010-02-01 23:30
  - Interpol or not d_labes 2010-02-01 14:52
    - Interpol! Helmut 2010-02-02 00:02
      - Interpol! ray_be 2010-02-03 18:31
        
        WinNonlin/Phoenix extrapolation to t=tau Helmut 2010-02-03 20:26
  - Meta-analysis Helmut 2010-02-07 17:41
  - Final version published Panks.79 2010-03-08 07:22
    - Cmin for MR-formulations? Helmut 2010-03-08 18:16
      - Cmin for MR-formulations? Marcel 2010-04-23 10:09
        
        MR-Guideline? Helmut 2010-04-23 12:34
- Overview of comments published Helmut 2010-02-10 18:33
  - Comments commented d_labes 2010-02-11 08:19
  - Definition of Cmin by EMEA Ravi 2010-03-13 12:05
    - The EMA’s Cmin & WinNonlin Helmut 2010-03-13 12:52