Philostics [Surveys]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2009-12-27 01:47 (5653 d 02:21 ago) – Posting: # 4522
Views: 14,086

Dear HS,

Thank for this and for the reference. I can learn a lot, and there is a loooooong way to go for me.

I wonder about a issue that is on the border between philosophy and statistics... Analysis of Log Cmax is generally based on the assumption that the residuals are normal. If we subsequently also want to qualify Log Cmin with some kind of statistic can we then conduct such an analysis with parametric statistics? Once we identify Log Cmax we know that the rest will be smaller than that value. Hence, there are constraints on the magnitudes of the residuals in the analysis of Log Cmin and therefore I would be inclined to think we violate an important assumption in parametric statistics?

(I shall abstain from proposing parametric statistics as a potential alternative, notch notch wink wink!)

Best regards,
EM.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,674 registered users;
48 visitors (0 registered, 48 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:08 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Philosophy, like medicine, has plenty of drugs, few good remedies,
and hardly any specific cures.    Sebastien-Roch Nicolas de Chamfort

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5