Deficiency centers [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2009-12-17 16:52 (6036 d 03:39 ago) – Posting: # 4496
Views: 6,758

Dear D. Labes,

❝ If I understand you right you suggest me to do the usual evaluation

❝ (ignoring the centers) and to wait for a deficiency letter?


First part: yes, second part: no.
OK, all of us are waiting for deficiency letters all the time. So it doesn't make a difference here. :lol3:

❝ And if it happens (low chance) then answer "Due to the identical protocol,

❝ due to the identical handling of blood samples, central assay of the blood

❝ samples, blah, blah ... no influence of the different centers was expected

❝ at all."? Eventually this could/should be included in the study report

❝ beforehand.


I would suggest to write the "blahblah" in the study protocol (not the report).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
357 visitors (0 registered, 357 guests [including 19 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:31 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Don’t compromise yourself.
You are all you’ve got.    Janis Joplin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5