Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • the flatter is better?

the flatter is better? [NCA / SHAM]

posted by d_labes – Berlin, Germany, 2009-12-04 09:46 (5617 d 01:58 ago) – Posting: # 4430
Views: 11,469

Dear Helmut!

❝ Remember the good old days of 'the flatter is better'?

:confused:

Do me the favor and enlighten me.

—
Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

Statistics in multiple dose study ratnakar1811 2009-12-01 11:09 [NCA / SHAM]
- Statistics in multiple dose study Helmut 2009-12-02 00:20
  - Statistics in multiple dose study ratnakar1811 2009-12-03 07:36
    - Statistics in multiple dose study Helmut 2009-12-03 14:53
      - Statistics in multiple dose study ratnakar1811 2009-12-04 08:21
  - Metrics for multiple profiles d_labes 2009-12-03 08:58
    - Metrics for multiple profiles Helmut 2009-12-03 15:50
      - Metrics for multiple profiles d_labes 2009-12-03 16:02
        
        Metrics for multiple profiles Helmut 2009-12-03 16:11
      - PTF is another story d_labes 2009-12-03 16:17
        
        PTF is another story Helmut 2009-12-03 16:42
        
        the flatter is better?d_labes 2009-12-04 08:46
        
        Biopharmaceutical history Helmut 2009-12-04 12:35

Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,671 registered users;
24 visitors (0 registered, 24 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:44 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The combination of some data and an aching desire
for an answer does not ensure that a reasonable answer
can be extracted from a given body of data. John W. Tukey

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz