Balaam's design, sample size doubled one more time [General Statistics]
Dear Helmut,
uups, you have caught me red handed!
My statement came from the factor 2 in the sample size formula on page 757, containing the number of subjects per sequence.
But I forgot here we have four sequences compared to two of the classical 2x2 cross-over.
Lesson learned: Think twice and check ones assumptions before touting it half-cooked to the audience. Sorry.
uups, you have caught me red handed!

My statement came from the factor 2 in the sample size formula on page 757, containing the number of subjects per sequence.
But I forgot here we have four sequences compared to two of the classical 2x2 cross-over.
Lesson learned: Think twice and check ones assumptions before touting it half-cooked to the audience. Sorry.
—
Regards,
Detlew
Regards,
Detlew
Complete thread:
- Balaam's design graveendranath 2009-09-23 09:13 [General Statistics]
- Balaam's design Helmut 2009-09-23 12:47
- Balaam's design, sample size d_labes 2009-09-24 16:13
- Balaam's design graveendranath 2009-09-25 12:23
- Balaam's design, intra-subject variances d_labes 2009-09-29 14:44
- Balaam's design, intra-subject variances graveendranath 2009-09-30 13:59
- Balaam's design, intra-subject variances d_labes 2009-09-29 14:44
- Balaam's design, sample size Helmut 2009-09-25 15:44
- Balaam's design, sample size doubled one more timed_labes 2009-09-28 11:58
- Balaam's design graveendranath 2009-09-25 12:23
- Balaam's design, sample size d_labes 2009-09-24 16:13
- Balaam's design Helmut 2009-09-23 12:47
