Regulators truncated [NCA / SHAM]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2009-06-18 11:26 (5811 d 06:42 ago) – Posting: # 3872
Views: 32,032

Dear Ohlbe, dear Jaime, dear all,

let me share some experience with regulators in the EMEA. In a recent submission of a BE study with a long half-life product (t1/2 from literature about 50-70 h) we submitted an evaluation with AUC(0-72h), Cmax and tmax as metrics, the typical truncated area setting.

Regulators response:
The Germans asked for AUC(0-inf)!
The French asked for lamdaZ (kel) and t1/2!


Hopefully they will not ask for residual area <20% :angry: .

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,671 registered users;
158 visitors (0 registered, 158 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:08 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

A statistical analysis, properly conducted, is a delicate dissection of
uncertainties, a surgery of suppositions.    Micheal J. Moroney

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5