Regulators truncated [NCA / SHAM]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2009-06-18 11:26 (5028 d 00:42 ago) – Posting: # 3872
Views: 23,185

Dear Ohlbe, dear Jaime, dear all,

let me share some experience with regulators in the EMEA. In a recent submission of a BE study with a long half-life product (t1/2 from literature about 50-70 h) we submitted an evaluation with AUC(0-72h), Cmax and tmax as metrics, the typical truncated area setting.

Regulators response:
The Germans asked for AUC(0-inf)!
The French asked for lamdaZ (kel) and t1/2!


Hopefully they will not ask for residual area <20% :angry: .

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,550 posts in 4,724 threads, 1,606 registered users;
16 visitors (0 registered, 16 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:08 CET (Europe/Vienna)

If there is an exception to any rule,
and if it can be proved by observation,
that rule is wrong.    Richard Feynman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5