failed bioequivalence study [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by A-M-R – Egypt, 2009-05-24 15:47 (5448 d 23:34 ago) – Posting: # 3742
Views: 3,885

HELP

have carried out bioequivalence study on sustained release formulation and the results between the test and reference drug were not satisfied as the geometric mean ratio for main pK parameters was less than 80% and the confidence interval for the three pharmacokinetic parameters fall outside the lower limit but it is within limit for the upper confidence limit
0.8 [>] CI [<] 1.25 , can you give me your opinion about these results and is these two drugs is totaly different or there is a possibility of sucess for this study and how.

very thanks
Amr hussein


Edit: Category changed. [Helmut]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,993 posts in 4,828 threads, 1,658 registered users;
70 visitors (0 registered, 70 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:22 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

So far as I can remember,
there is not one word in the Gospels
in praise of intelligence.    Bertrand Russell

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5