ratio of dose-adjusted AUCs [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by martin  – Austria, 2009-05-16 13:33 (5879 d 06:06 ago) – Posting: # 3686
Views: 3,593

dear hs!

what do you think about comparing dose-adjusted AUCs? on assumption of dose-proportionality the ratio of dose-adjusted AUCs should be one.

in case of more than two dose-levels, application of an adequate stepwise testing procedure (based on the closed testing approach) on dose-adjusted AUCs can help to identify the dose-range where dose-proportionality holds. this approach keeps the familywise error rate at the pre-specified alpha-level which should be more powerful than the application of the bonferroni correction.

I am looking forward to your opinion on this topic

best regards

Martin

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,674 registered users;
60 visitors (0 registered, 60 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:40 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature
more difficult to explain than
simple, statistically probable things.    Richard Dawkins

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5