R2-adj, cut-off [PK / PD]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2009-04-23 16:39 (5917 d 22:24 ago) – Posting: # 3593
Views: 10,423

Dear Raveendra!

❝ […] what is the minimum R2 value […]. some are using 0.8 and some are using 0.75. which one correct?


Neither nor, because R² depends on the number of data points used in the estimation. In linear regression R² 0.9756 (n=3) ‘explains’ the same amount of information as R² 0.5314 (n=6)!
For a rather lengthy discussion see this thread.
If you truly want to set a cut-off, then R²adj should be used. BTW a cut-off common to all studies is not justified. For drug A a R²adj of 0.95 may be easy to get, whilst for drug B a R²adj of even 0.75 very difficult.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,427 posts in 4,929 threads, 1,676 registered users;
48 visitors (0 registered, 48 guests [including 20 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:04 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Many people tend to look at programming styles and languages like religions:
if you belong to one, you cannot belong to others.
But this analogy is another fallacy.    Niklaus Wirth

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5