Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • Evaluation of Reference variability

Evaluation of Reference variability [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut – Vienna, Austria, 2009-04-18 14:31 (5908 d 03:50 ago) – Posting: # 3562
Views: 4,268

Dear Nirali,

see this post.

—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
Helmut Schütz

[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Evaluation of Reference variability Nirali 2009-04-13 11:53 [Design Issues]
- Evaluation of Reference variability KR 2009-04-13 14:39
- Evaluation of Reference variability Ravi 2009-04-14 06:25
  - Evaluation of Reference variability Nirali 2009-04-17 07:38
    - Evaluation of Reference variability Ohlbe 2009-04-17 10:04
    - Evaluation of Reference variability Helmut 2009-04-17 13:44
      - Evaluation of Reference variability Nirali 2009-04-18 09:04
        
        Evaluation of Reference variabilityHelmut 2009-04-18 12:31
        
        Evaluation of Reference variability Nirali 2009-04-18 19:34
      - Evaluation of Reference variability Marcel 2010-03-16 13:10
        
        Evaluation of Reference variability Helmut 2010-03-16 16:01
        
        Evaluation of Reference variability ElMaestro 2010-03-16 17:13
        
        Some desultory thoughts Helmut 2010-03-16 18:59
        
        Evaluation of Reference variability Marcel 2010-03-17 12:47

Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
54 visitors (0 registered, 54 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:22 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling. Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz