Source Document: certified copies [GxP / QC / QA]

posted by Preet – 2009-03-19 09:22 (5516 d 07:26 ago) – Posting: # 3378
Views: 6,857

Dear All,

Please guide me on the above issue. Is it necessary to take signatures on the photocopy of source document for documentation purpose? (as we require to share few forms (from CRF)/documents with another department of CRO).

e.g.
1. We are sharing sampling time point deviation form with Biostatistician. In clinical department we are maintaining original copy and photocopy will be shared by statistical department. As per our current practice this photocopy is not certified (attested) by clinical department.

According to ICH GCP E6 guidelines. section 1 Glossary;
1.51 Source Data: All information in original records and certified copies of original records of clinical findings, observations, or other activities in a clinical trial necessary for the reconstruction and evaluation of the trial. Source data are contained in source documents (original records or certified copies).

Now my question is, Do we need to take signatures on the photocopy of Sampling time point deviations intended for stat documentation process?

Warm Regards,
Preet

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,993 posts in 4,828 threads, 1,651 registered users;
106 visitors (0 registered, 106 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:49 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Never never never never use Excel.
Not even for calculation of arithmetic means.    Martin Wolfsegger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5