Calculation of AUC0-72 [NCA / SHAM]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2009-01-26 17:57 (5935 d 14:53 ago) – Posting: # 3125
Views: 32,346

Dear Helmut,

❝ sorry for the late response – I was driven by discussions about the drafted European BE-Guideline. :-D


"Late is not too late".

I am with you if the values in the last part of the concentration time course are <LOQ. But I think it's different with missing values (vial broken or so) especially in case of long half life drugs.

Because time points are spread occasionally with 24h in the last part, there may be a considerable portion of AUC missing.

❝ I wouldn’t start trying to get an estimate of C72.


Is this sentence then furthermore your opinion?
—
Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,670 registered users;
117 visitors (0 registered, 117 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:50 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

There are two possible outcomes: if the result confirms the
hypothesis, then you’ve made a measurement. If the result is
contrary to the hypothesis, then you’ve made a discovery.    Enrico Fermi

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5