residuals of period 1!! [🇷 for BE/BA]
Dear D. Labes,
thanks a lot forcing me to polish up my rusty and limited knowledge of STATISTICA's scripting language!
If I remember it correctly I struggled hours (days?) to reproduce Chow's & Liu's tables 8.2.1/8.2.3 (Clayton's famous data) from their first edition (1992). Although they mentioned period 1 throughout the text and in the table's headings, they used modeled period 2 values for subjects 10-18 (in sequence RT). After a lot of trial and error I gave up in order to continue with their examples.
This explains the wrong sign.
Correcting the calculation of sequence 1 everything is fine:
Other stuff in NCSS (I used values rounded to 6 significant digits):
Thanks, I didn't know that one.
Sooner or later we will end up with true 'validation' of code - or our sloppy use of it...
thanks a lot forcing me to polish up my rusty and limited knowledge of STATISTICA's scripting language!

If I remember it correctly I struggled hours (days?) to reproduce Chow's & Liu's tables 8.2.1/8.2.3 (Clayton's famous data) from their first edition (1992). Although they mentioned period 1 throughout the text and in the table's headings, they used modeled period 2 values for subjects 10-18 (in sequence RT). After a lot of trial and error I gave up in order to continue with their examples.
This explains the wrong sign.

Correcting the calculation of sequence 1 everything is fine:
resid
W 0.9375813, p 0.3882104
stud
W 0.9375817, p 0.3882145
Other stuff in NCSS (I used values rounded to 6 significant digits):
resid
Test Prob
Test Name Value Level
Shapiro-Wilk W 0.9375815 0.388212
Anderson-Darling 0.3454837 0.484160
Martinez-Iglewicz 1.003992 >10%
Kolmogorov-Smirnov 0.1547813 >10%
stud
Test Prob
Test Name Value Level
Shapiro-Wilk W 0.9375818 0.388217
Anderson-Darling 0.3454824 0.484163
Martinez-Iglewicz 1.003992 >10%
Kolmogorov-Smirnov 0.1547828 >10%
❝ For using period 1 (or period 2) residuals see f.i.
❝ Chen et.al.
❝ A note on ANOVA assumptions and robust analysis for a cross-over study
❝ Stat. Med. 2002, 21, p1377-1386
Thanks, I didn't know that one.
❝ BTW: Using your residuals (Studentized) I got your results.
Sooner or later we will end up with true 'validation' of code - or our sloppy use of it...

—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- Preview: outlier detection with bear v2.1.0 yjlee168 2008-12-10 12:51 [🇷 for BE/BA]
- Preview: outlier detection with bear v2.1.0 Helmut 2008-12-11 14:01
- Preview: outlier detection with bear v2.1.0 yjlee168 2008-12-11 18:38
- Preview: outlier detection with bear v2.1.0 Helmut 2008-12-11 21:28
- Preview: outlier detection with bear v2.1.0 yjlee168 2008-12-14 00:49
- Preview: outlier detection with bear v2.1.0 d_labes 2008-12-15 11:52
- Preview: outlier detection with bear v2.1.0 Helmut 2008-12-15 13:28
- residuals of period 1 d_labes 2008-12-15 14:44
- residuals of period 1!!Helmut 2008-12-16 04:02
- residuals of period 1!! d_labes 2008-12-16 08:34
- Shapiro-Wilk normality test yjlee168 2008-12-17 18:28
- residuals of period 1!!Helmut 2008-12-16 04:02
- residuals of period 1 d_labes 2008-12-15 14:44
- Preview: outlier detection with bear v2.1.0 Helmut 2008-12-15 13:28
- Preview: outlier detection with bear v2.1.0 Helmut 2008-12-11 21:28
- Preview: outlier detection with bear v2.1.0 yjlee168 2008-12-11 18:38
- Preview: outlier detection with bear v2.1.0 Helmut 2008-12-11 14:01