Preview: outlier detection with bear v2.1.0 [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2008-12-15 14:28 (5973 d 09:14 ago) – Posting: # 2924
Views: 13,194

Dear D. Labes, dear Yung-jin,

very strange.

Below the intra-subject residuals to 5 decimals and the R-code:
intra <- c(-1.12602,+1.31764,+0.17871,+1.04384,-1.44654,-0.85471,-0.45394,
           -1.09608,+0.32237,+0.41330,+1.68203,-1.27489,+0.84339,+0.45090)
shapiro.test(intra)

        Shapiro-Wilk normality test

data:  intra
W = 0.9333, p-value = 0.3389

Fidling around with the format options gives
W = 0.933267, p-value = 0.3388638

My version of NCSS is 2001 (December 2, 2002):
Normality Test Section of intra
                Test       Prob      Decision
Test Name       Value      Level     (5%)
Shapiro-Wilk W  0.9332672  0.338867  Can't reject normality


What's going on here? :confused:

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,668 registered users;
24 visitors (0 registered, 24 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:43 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The difference between a surrogate and a true endpoint
is like the difference between a cheque and cash.
You can get the cheque earlier but then,
of course, it might bounce.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5