Preview: outlier detection with bear v2.1.0 [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2008-12-11 15:01 (5977 d 08:43 ago) – Posting: # 2906
Views: 13,442

Dear Hsin-ya & Yung-jin,

Wonderful!

Some remarks:
Which dataset are you using (I want to recalculate your results)?
It maybe nice to flag values (i.e., give the subject's no.) in the QQ-plots which are outside ±2·sigma.
Another suggestion would be a plot of ln(predicted) vs. studentized residuals. Such a plot allows the distinction between concordant outliers (T/R similar to the majority of subjects, but both T and R lower or higher than normal = parallel shift in plot) and discordant outliers (T or R lower or higher; suspected formulation failure or subject-by-formulation interaction). For an example see here.

P.S.
In your example pdf for v2.0.1 the labels for time and conc are mixed up (pages 30-32). A suggestion would be to scale both spaghetti-plots (pages 30-31) to the maximum concentration observed in the entire dataset (not within formulations). Then it's easier to compare both formulations visually.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,668 registered users;
23 visitors (0 registered, 23 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:45 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The difference between a surrogate and a true endpoint
is like the difference between a cheque and cash.
You can get the cheque earlier but then,
of course, it might bounce.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5