Urban legend? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2008-11-24 16:06 (6050 d 15:18 ago) – Posting: # 2790
Views: 23,308

Dear Helmut!

❝ ❝ But you can do it on your own: Fire up some PK software (even M$-Excel would do the job) - define parameters of two hypothetical formulations in such a way that Cmax is let's say 10% apart - go into steady state - the difference should be smaller.


Really? Or just an Urban legend of the pharmacokinetolophystic (© ElMaestro) type?


Self-doubts are the essence of real scientific work! :-D

❝ ... ratio stays the same. Am I missing something?


Try to change not F in the model, but rather the absorption constant ka. Or both.

Using a one-compartment model and the rate constants

ke=0.06
ka(test)=2
ka(ref)=4

I obtained (F, dose and Vc identical for both formulations)
- single dose Cmax ratio=0.9565
- steady state Cmax ratio=0.9711 (tau=8 h)
(Hope I have implemented the formulas in M$-Excel in a hurry right).

To quote your link to Wikipedia:
"Like all folklore, urban legends are not necessarily false but they are often distorted, exaggerated, or sensationalized over time.." ;-) .
This one and a half percent increase is not so impressive to me. Me be two-compartment models do it better. Or both changes in F and ka.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,675 registered users;
30 visitors (0 registered, 30 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:24 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Philosophy, like medicine, has plenty of drugs, few good remedies,
and hardly any specific cures.    Sebastien-Roch Nicolas de Chamfort

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5