90% CIs for BE? [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by yjlee168 Homepage – Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 2008-11-17 19:26 (6060 d 03:44 ago) – Posting: # 2699
Views: 13,300

dear Helmut,

Yes! :crying:


That's terrible. They have a program called "...a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) with the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)..." and "... Under the terms of the CRADA, Pharsight will provide the FDA with software for the analysis, visualization, storage, reporting and review of PK/PD data. The specific Pharsight products covered by the CRADA include:

* Pharsight Knowledgebase Server™ (PKS™)
* PKS Validation Suite™
* WinNonlin®...[quoted from Pharsight CRADA website]

Does that imply that USA FDA can accept Westlake's approach? Or there is nothing to do with this?

All the best,
-- Yung-jin Lee
bear v2.9.2:- created by Hsin-ya Lee & Yung-jin Lee
Kaohsiung, Taiwan https://www.pkpd168.com/bear
Download link (updated) -> here

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,671 registered users;
43 visitors (0 registered, 43 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:11 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5