Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • 90% CIs for BE?

90% CIs for BE? [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by ElMaestro – Denmark, 2008-11-17 14:51 (6060 d 05:01 ago) – Posting: # 2690
Views: 13,212

❝ BTW, Westlake’s CI should never be used and thrown into the statistical garbage collection...

....where I hope it will land on top of individual bioequivalence and breaks its spine.

EM.

Complete thread:

90% CIs for BE? yjlee168 2008-11-17 08:52 [🇷 for BE/BA]
- 90% CIs for BE? ElMaestro 2008-11-17 09:46
- 90% CIs for BE? d_labes 2008-11-17 13:07
  - There can be only one! Helmut 2008-11-17 17:12
- 90% CIs for BE? Helmut 2008-11-17 13:30
  - 90% CIs for BE?ElMaestro 2008-11-17 13:51
    - 90% CIs for BE? d_labes 2008-11-17 13:56
  - 90% CIs for BE? yjlee168 2008-11-17 18:10
    - 90% CIs for BE? Helmut 2008-11-17 18:14
      - 90% CIs for BE? yjlee168 2008-11-17 18:26
        
        90% CIs for BE? ElMaestro 2008-11-17 19:49

Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,671 registered users;
64 visitors (0 registered, 64 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:53 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling. Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz