Type III SS in balanced, crossover BE studies? [🇷 for BE/BA]

posted by yjlee168 Homepage – Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 2008-10-21 15:19 (5663 d 01:40 ago) – Posting: # 2572
Views: 55,248

Dear EM,

Since bear now is designed only applicable to analyze data obtained from a balanced, crossover BE study, that's why I ask if it is necessary to display Type III SS with Type I SS simultaneously for such a BE study at this moment. Currently, it seems not necessary to do that.

Thanks for your message.

❝ Whenever a study is balanced regulators will / should accept everything, because type I = type III (= type other, too). 99.999% don't care anyway, because they haven't got the faintest clue about statistics, as far as I've heard.

—
All the best,
-- Yung-jin Lee
bear v2.9.1:- created by Hsin-ya Lee & Yung-jin Lee
Kaohsiung, Taiwan https://www.pkpd168.com/bear
Download link (updated) -> here
Thread locked

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,991 posts in 4,827 threads, 1,647 registered users;
60 visitors (1 registered, 59 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:59 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If you don’t like something change it;
if you can’t change it, change the way you think about it.    Mary Engelbreit

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5