Carry-over → 🚮 [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Mahmoud  – Jordan, 2025-12-09 11:47 (201 d 18:12 ago) – Posting: # 24525
Views: 3,865

Dear Helmut

This is not true to delete carry-over from your vocabulary

some crosover designs need carry-over in the model

Please do not write anythings without refs

your not statistician

❝ ❝ please delete carry-over from your vocabulary.

❝

❝ Good point...... but CRLs won't leave you without these questions.... somehow regulators seems to be obsessed with that borderline "Carry-over"


Edit: correction in 2nd post merged with first. You can edit your post within 24 hours from the original submission, please see FAQ #3 [Ohlbe]

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,570 registered users;
322 visitors (0 registered, 322 guests [including 17 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:00 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Most scientists today are devoid of ideas, full of fear, intent on
producing some paltry result so that they can add to the flood
of inane papers that now constitutes “scientific progress”
in many areas.    Paul Feyerabend

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5