ICHM13A/Multiple Test Product Studies [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Mikkabel – Belgium, 2025-11-04 10:46 (230 d 08:14 ago) – Posting: # 24476
Views: 2,423

Dear all,

We are planning to conduct a comparative pharmacokinetic (PK) study including two test products and one comparator.
According to Section 2.2.5.2 “Multiple Test Products” of ICH M13A, when the objective is to demonstrate bioequivalence (BE) for any of the test formulations, a multiplicity (alpha) adjustment may be required.

Further clarification on this topic is provided in the M13A Q&A document.
In our study, we intend to apply a hierarchical testing approach, considering that one of the formulations has shown more promising in-vitro results.
Specifically, our plan is to first assess BE between Formulation 1 and the comparator. If BE is demonstrated, we would then proceed to assess Formulation 2 versus the comparator.

Could you please confirm whether, under this hierarchical testing approach, an alpha adjustment is required, or if it can be omitted in accordance with the statement from the M13A Q&A:

“Formally, there is no need for multiplicity correction for each individual test, but the type I error (consumer risk) is still controlled.”

Thank you very much for your clarification.

Kind regards,
Mikkabel

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,655 posts in 4,993 threads, 1,571 registered users;
164 visitors (0 registered, 164 guests [including 31 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:01 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Scientists cannot simply hang their subjectivities
up on a hook outside the laboratory door.    Ruth Bleier

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5