2-period full replicate design for IR formulation – EMA perspective [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by BEQool  – 2025-03-01 13:33 (57 d 12:20 ago) – Posting: # 24378
Views: 465

Dear Ankit Parikh,

❝ Question: To address the challenges related to retention of cancer patients in PK BE study, we want to plan 2-period full replicate design. Will the EMA accept this approach for Immediate Release (IR) formulation?

Do you mean 2-period or 4-period design? I.e., do you mean 2 PK days (once T and once R) or 4 PK days (twice T and twice R)?

❝ So, based on our interpretation this will be TTRR or RRTT design.

Did you then use this 4-period replicate desing with 4 PK days?

❝ As per the published EMA Public Assessment Report (EPARs), there are few products approved by EMA using this approach such as Bupropion and Felodipine modified release formulations.

I was looking for these EPARs but could not find them. Could you please share them?

Best regrads
BEQool

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,669 registered users;
26 visitors (0 registered, 26 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:53 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

There are two possible outcomes: if the result confirms the
hypothesis, then you’ve made a measurement. If the result is
contrary to the hypothesis, then you’ve made a discovery.    Enrico Fermi

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5